NFL - Concussion/Head Trauma Precautions and Implications

An issue quickly overtaking the “steroid-era” in (professional) sports, or at least football is the issue of concussions and severe head trauma. In the last few years the awareness of concussions and head trauma has increased as new rules have been implemented and strictly enforced by officials. Recently, referees have been asked to look out for symptoms and/signs of head injury sustained during play, that may be overlooked by team doctors/trainers. Two weeks ago, San Diego Chargers’ offensive lineman Kris Deilman experienced a concussion. At the time, he was allowed to continue play, as he did not fall to the ground or show obvious signs of distress. He was later allowed to fly home from New York; upon landing he experienced a seizure. Other than the diagnosed concussion he appears to be in good health.

As a football player head trauma is a legitimate concern. What many may not realize are the implications that it has on an individual later in life, as it can lead to various mental illnesses and general complications. Despite what some may say about the new rules and how they affect the nature of the game, the players safety is much more important. Every and any possible precaution should be taken in order to prevent such injuries.

HGH testing and Tobacco Ban – MLB

In recent Major League Baseball news, there has been a push to ban the use of smokeless tobacco in the public view during games. As well as a topic seemingly overshadowed by the issues surrounding the NFL; the use and testing of HGH in the MLB. Both controversial areas were publicly addressed when two House Democrats, Henry Waxman of California and Frank Pallone of New Jersey, wrote a letter to both Bud Selig, commissioner of the MLB, and Michael Weiner, executive director of the players union, requesting significant changes in policy. The representatives stated: “These issues affect the integrity of the game, the health of your players, and most important, the health of teenagers who aspire to be like pro players” (Waxman & Weiner - ESPN). Some baseball players interviewed said they would embrace a ban on tobacco products, while others felt that a ban would infringe on their personal freedom. As for the testing of HGH, “The time to begin testing for HGH in baseball has arrived” (Waxman & Weiner – ESPN). The use of blood testing seems to be the preferred method of prevention, as it has been implemented in both the NFL and the Olympics already.

In regards to the use of smokeless tobacco in the MLB I cannot be swayed in either direction. Solid evidence has been put forth supporting both sides of the argument. A recent ban of smokeless tobacco has been instated in Minor League Baseball, and there have been seemingly no serious issues. It is a logical medical concern, one that cannot be ignored by the Players Union, for those who choose to use it. Many companies do not allow individuals to use tobacco while working, therefore it seems logical that MLB players be held in the same regard while they perform their jobs. On the flip side of things, tobacco is tradition in baseball dating back to the 19^th century. I do agree with some players that a ban would infringe upon their freedom. Despite the fact that they would not be able to use it in the public view or well wearing a uniform, they would still be able to use it. If a ban is set in place, players will find a way around “breaking” the rules, just as they do with performance enhancing drugs.

The issue of HGH in sports is getting out of control; there should clearly be testing no matter what method they choose to utilize. It is an unfair advantage and a serious medical concern for those who use them. There should be no argument or complaining if testing becomes policy.